Underwriting

What underwriters open first

Three months of bank statements arrive as PDFs. The underwriter starts at the back: the most recent month. The first thing they look at isn't the deposits. It's the end-of-day balance pattern.

A healthy business has end-of-day balances that don't routinely sit near zero or below. If the operating account is hovering at $200 most nights and dipping into NSF territory three days a month, that's the first signal of operational stress. Even strong revenue numbers don't fix that picture.

The deposit pattern

Next: total deposits per month, and the shape of those deposits.

Total deposit volume matters for sizing. A business depositing $80K/month qualifies for a different range than one depositing $200K/month.

Shape matters for confidence:

NSFs and overdrafts

A non-sufficient funds (NSF) charge or overdraft happens when an automated debit hits an account that doesn't have the cash. Underwriters look at:

Existing advance remittances

If the business has active revenue-based advances, the daily/weekly debits show up on bank statements. Underwriters can usually identify them by the pattern.

Two questions follow:

  1. How much daily/weekly cash is already going to existing advances? As a percentage of daily deposits, this is the single best predictor of whether a new advance will distress the business.
  2. Did the merchant disclose all of them? Undisclosed advances are a fast no.

Cash deposits versus electronic deposits

A business that does most of its revenue in cash is harder to underwrite than a business doing most of its revenue electronically. Cash deposits are easier to manipulate. Underwriters look for:

Internal transfers between accounts

If the business has multiple bank accounts and moves money between them, underwriters back those transfers out of the deposit total. They're not revenue.

This is where files get rejected for inflated revenue claims. The application says $200K/month; the bank statements, properly analyzed, say $120K. The application is wrong, and the underwriter wonders what else is wrong.

Loan deposits and funding from other lenders

When a business gets funded by another lender, the funded amount lands as a deposit. Underwriters can usually identify these. Loan deposits don't count as revenue.

A business that received an advance two weeks ago and is already applying for another one is stacking, and the daily remittance from the recent funder is already eating into capacity.

If two or three funders all pass, that's a real signal — and a more useful one than approvals.

What this means for merchants applying

Three things you can do to make a strong file:

  1. Send all three months of statements, complete and unedited. Skipping a month or sending statements with redactions raises immediate flags.
  2. Disclose any active advances upfront. We'll find them in the bank statements. Disclosing builds trust; hiding kills the file.
  3. Don't apply 24 hours after a slow week. If the most recent week is unusually slow, expect the offer to reflect that. Wait two weeks for a normal-looking statement set.

What this means for ISOs

  1. Pull the statements yourself before submitting. Spot the issues that will get the file rejected.
  2. Set realistic expectations early. If the bank statements show concentration risk or rising NSFs, the offer will reflect that.
  3. Submit clean. PDFs of original statements, not screenshots, not summaries.

How LendPoint underwrites

Our underwriting team reads bank statements in-house. Every file. We don't outsource this to a bureau or a black-box scoring engine.

When we have a question about a file, we call the merchant or the ISO directly. When we say no, we tell you why — not in the rejection email, but in a conversation if you want one.

If you're ready to apply, start your application. ISOs with a file you're not sure about, talk to your partner manager first.

More from the learning hub